sábado, 25 de agosto de 2012

LOS TOROS, LOS ZORROS Y LOS INGLESES

                                                                           
GUADARRAMA EN MARCHA
Asociación cultural
La tradición

RAE
3. f. Doctrina, costumbre, etc., conservada en un pueblo por transmisión de padres a hijos.

Los ingleses, gentes tradicionales si las hay, abolieron la caza del zorro por brutal.
En España  seguimos con los toros -“de toda la vida”, se oye a diario como prueba de nuestra tradicional forma de vida. Los ingleses con motivo de la abolición de las corridas en Cataluña comentaron la noticia diciendo que se había abolido una costumbre propia de “barbarians”. 

Jeremías Bentham, filósofo inglés del siglo XVIII es ampliamente reconocido, entre otros atributos que exaltaron su sensibilidad, como promotor de los derechos de los animales. Dejó claro que la capacidad de sufrimiento antes bien que la de la razón marcaba el signo distintivo de las semejanzas que lo emparentaban con el ser humano. Argumentaba que de ser así lo mismo podría argumentarse de los niños menores –“infants”- y de los minusválidos mentales.

“If reason alone were the criterion by which we judge who ought to have rights, human infants and adults with certain forms of disability might fall short, too. In 1789, alluding to the limited degree of legal protection afforded to slaves in the French West Indies by the Code Jeremy Bentham

“The day has been, I am sad to say in many places it is not yet past, in which the greater part of the species, under the denomination of slaves, have been treated by the law exactly upon the same footing, as, in England for example, the inferior races of animals are still. The day may come when the rest of the animal creation may acquire those rights which never could have been witholden from them but by the hand of tyranny. The French have already discovered that the blackness of the skin is no reason a human being should be abandoned without redress to the caprice of a tormentor.
It may one day come to be recognized that the number of the legs, the villosity of the skin, or the termination of the os sacrum are reasons equally insufficient for abandoning a sensitive being to the same fate. What else is it that should trace the insuperable line? Is it the faculty of reason or perhaps the faculty of discourse? But a full-grown horse or dog, is beyond comparison a more rational,  as well as a more conversable animal, than an infant of a day or a week or even a month, old. But suppose the case were otherwise, what would it avail? The question is not, Can they reason? nor, Can they talk? but, Can they suffer?”

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario